Should I replace my Atom?
Posted: Tue Feb 18, 2003 6:45 pm
Should I replace my Atom?
by Kurt Kurt
Been paddling an Atom for a couple years. It's pretty much the only whitewater boat I've ever paddled; one weekend in an open boat, bought the Atom. Never yakked, no OC since then, so I have limited experience with other hulls.
I finally (!) trust my roll and feel comfortable on II+ water, looking to step up to solid III next summer. I'm at the point where I can finally make use of the edges on the Atom, but also think they'll be a liability on more difficult water.
I have the opportunity to get a great deal on a little used Z and I've heard they make great conversion boats. I'm 6', 185. Preferred uses are surfing and river running; the thinks I like best about the Atom are it's hull speed and surfing ability.
So what are the pro's and con's of a Z conversion as compared to an Atom?
Posted on Sep 13, 2002, 8:44 PM
Z is BIG step up from Atom
by Boise Bob
I have the same physical stats and I sold my Atom after 1.5 years because of its length. The Z has reasonable speed, but slower than Atom. The surfability and play of the Z is great. I have the seat height at 6" and its very stable. The Z cockpit is big for a yak and wide..26". Sell the Atom to the next beginner and convert the Z.
Bringing C1 to the west...Boise Bob
Posted on Sep 15, 2002, 2:22 PM
Ja
by Steffen Steffen
Replace it.
I changed to a Gliss and feel much saver on WW than before. The Atom is not as fast as you think. It tracks good because of his length. But not better than the Gliss. I think the Z is a good choice
Posted on Sep 16, 2002, 11:58 AM
Replace?
by Rob weum Rob weum
You don't have to replace your atom if you really like it but you should buy the Z if it's a good deal! I started paddling a Z this spring (6'5" 190lbs.) and I really love it. I think it has way more play potential than the Atom and I find it to be a great boat on class II and III whitewater. I also have a friend who loves the Atom. When he heard it was discontinued he ran out and bought 2! I've only paddled an Atom on flat water so I can't compare very well. Good luck. Don't pass up this opportunity!
Rob
Posted on Sep 17, 2002, 6:05 AM
the chine on the atom are not as sharp as they are on the Z
by Quico Reed Quico Reed
first, let me humbly qualify what i am about to say in that I am an Open canoeist and a kayaker, i have not c-1ed, but I did stay at a Holiday Inn Express, and I've been "studying" the idea...I think I'm getting the bug!
Anyway, I've been looking at the Atom for a while, and have made a point to check them out close up. I ran into a couple of guys on the Ocoee, one in an Atom, and one in a Z-1. The chine on the Z seemed much more pronounced on the Z than the Atom, but not as sharp still as the Gliss I paddle now. I hear folks comment about the aggressive edges of the Atom, but by my standards, after starting in a very gentle Pirouette S, moving to a Gliss, and seeing the chine in the Atom, I have to say that while it is more aggressive than the Pirouette or the Cascade, it is NOT as aggressive as modern "play-runner" chines.
So, when I read your comment that you are afraid that the edges on the Atom will be a liability on whitewater above class II, I have to disagree. I think the Atom will be a superb river runner through class 4, BUT what would have me worried is the pointed bow, due to the risk of bow-pinning. But someone else will ahve to enlighten me about how the Atom handles steep drops, if it buries its bow or planes out ok.
But if you can afford to get a second boat, do so, and don't sell the Atom until you are sure you don't want to paddle it anymore. I miss my old Pirouette terribly whenever I am at the top of a new, more difficult river, and am not sure if I REALLY want to paddle my little Gliss down them there BIG old rapids. The Atom might be a better river runner than you think.
Posted on Oct 11, 2002, 9:33 AM
by Kurt Kurt
Been paddling an Atom for a couple years. It's pretty much the only whitewater boat I've ever paddled; one weekend in an open boat, bought the Atom. Never yakked, no OC since then, so I have limited experience with other hulls.
I finally (!) trust my roll and feel comfortable on II+ water, looking to step up to solid III next summer. I'm at the point where I can finally make use of the edges on the Atom, but also think they'll be a liability on more difficult water.
I have the opportunity to get a great deal on a little used Z and I've heard they make great conversion boats. I'm 6', 185. Preferred uses are surfing and river running; the thinks I like best about the Atom are it's hull speed and surfing ability.
So what are the pro's and con's of a Z conversion as compared to an Atom?
Posted on Sep 13, 2002, 8:44 PM
Z is BIG step up from Atom
by Boise Bob
I have the same physical stats and I sold my Atom after 1.5 years because of its length. The Z has reasonable speed, but slower than Atom. The surfability and play of the Z is great. I have the seat height at 6" and its very stable. The Z cockpit is big for a yak and wide..26". Sell the Atom to the next beginner and convert the Z.
Bringing C1 to the west...Boise Bob
Posted on Sep 15, 2002, 2:22 PM
Ja
by Steffen Steffen
Replace it.
I changed to a Gliss and feel much saver on WW than before. The Atom is not as fast as you think. It tracks good because of his length. But not better than the Gliss. I think the Z is a good choice
Posted on Sep 16, 2002, 11:58 AM
Replace?
by Rob weum Rob weum
You don't have to replace your atom if you really like it but you should buy the Z if it's a good deal! I started paddling a Z this spring (6'5" 190lbs.) and I really love it. I think it has way more play potential than the Atom and I find it to be a great boat on class II and III whitewater. I also have a friend who loves the Atom. When he heard it was discontinued he ran out and bought 2! I've only paddled an Atom on flat water so I can't compare very well. Good luck. Don't pass up this opportunity!
Rob
Posted on Sep 17, 2002, 6:05 AM
the chine on the atom are not as sharp as they are on the Z
by Quico Reed Quico Reed
first, let me humbly qualify what i am about to say in that I am an Open canoeist and a kayaker, i have not c-1ed, but I did stay at a Holiday Inn Express, and I've been "studying" the idea...I think I'm getting the bug!
Anyway, I've been looking at the Atom for a while, and have made a point to check them out close up. I ran into a couple of guys on the Ocoee, one in an Atom, and one in a Z-1. The chine on the Z seemed much more pronounced on the Z than the Atom, but not as sharp still as the Gliss I paddle now. I hear folks comment about the aggressive edges of the Atom, but by my standards, after starting in a very gentle Pirouette S, moving to a Gliss, and seeing the chine in the Atom, I have to say that while it is more aggressive than the Pirouette or the Cascade, it is NOT as aggressive as modern "play-runner" chines.
So, when I read your comment that you are afraid that the edges on the Atom will be a liability on whitewater above class II, I have to disagree. I think the Atom will be a superb river runner through class 4, BUT what would have me worried is the pointed bow, due to the risk of bow-pinning. But someone else will ahve to enlighten me about how the Atom handles steep drops, if it buries its bow or planes out ok.
But if you can afford to get a second boat, do so, and don't sell the Atom until you are sure you don't want to paddle it anymore. I miss my old Pirouette terribly whenever I am at the top of a new, more difficult river, and am not sure if I REALLY want to paddle my little Gliss down them there BIG old rapids. The Atom might be a better river runner than you think.
Posted on Oct 11, 2002, 9:33 AM